plagiarism checker online for journal articles

She couldn’t find it on any search engine, nor on the SCI database. Surprisingly, however, she could not locate the journal in which her paper had been published. However, she discovered that another author who had given a negative rating to the vendor had suffered the same fate, and her paper too had been published by the same university. She tried to contact the vendor but received no response.

Going through the paper, she realized it was her paper.

The author was happy and submitted the paper to a reputable journal in her field.Ī month later, she got peer review results along with an email from the editor saying that the paper was rejected due to high similarity with a published paper.Īction: When the author checked the journal’s plagiarism check report, she was shocked to see a 67 percent similarity with a student paper online. She then conducted an auto check from somewhere else and her paper showed an overall 12% similarity. The author did not take the vendor’s threat seriously and decided not to delete the negative rating. Once the paper is indexed in a database, her paper would not be accepted by any other journal on grounds of duplicate publication. What they meant by indexing was that the article would be published in a Science Citation Index or SCI recognized journal or website without attributing it to the original author.

The vendor immediately messaged her threatening to get her paper indexed if she did not delete the negative rating. The author was upset and gave a negative rating to the vendor online. When she contacted the customer service vendor, they insisted that if she wanted the plagiarism check redone she would need to pay again. References are usually not a part of the plagiarism check. The author was upset as she had not expected this. Going through it in detail, she found that the references section had also been included in the check. Since she had written the paper herself and had taken care to avoid copying from any source, she was confident that the report was incorrect. On receiving the plagiarism check report, however, she was surprised that the content similarity was 38 per cent, which was very high. The author decided on the third option as it was cost-effective and sent the paper to the vendor. However, availing the same service through an online marketplace would reduce the cost by half and if the paper was sent through a customer service vendor, the cost would reduce further. She found an online plagiarism check service but the cost was high. Although she had written the paper herself and there was ideally no need for a plagiarism check, she wanted to get it done. Case: An author decided to run her paper through a plagiarism check before submitting it to a journal.

Plagiarism checker online for journal articles